Thread: Tiger or Vista?
View Single Post
  #23 (permalink)  
Old 11-12-2006, 09:31 PM
robputt796 robputt796 is offline
Secondary Administrator
 
Join Date: 20 Feb 2006
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 579
robputt796 has a reputation beyond reputerobputt796 has a reputation beyond reputerobputt796 has a reputation beyond reputerobputt796 has a reputation beyond reputerobputt796 has a reputation beyond reputerobputt796 has a reputation beyond reputerobputt796 has a reputation beyond reputerobputt796 has a reputation beyond reputerobputt796 has a reputation beyond reputerobputt796 has a reputation beyond reputerobputt796 has a reputation beyond repute
Default

How many of you guys have actually used and experienced a mac for a long amount of time? I have one, and I haven't turned it off for the last 9 months. It just works and lives. And trust me OSX runs good on intel chips. Addmitedly PowerPC chips were good. But so are intel ones, OSX is so well made, it is fitted to just say 12 CPUs not a whole range like windows. Therefore it can be made to run extremely stabaly, because it only has 12 sets of possible differences. Were windows deals with all CPUs in the x86 and x64 range.

Leopard AnyDay, are we really still chatting about tiger. Check out Leopard. It is really good exspecially the time machines and stuff like that.
__________________
-Rob Putt - Blog!
CompuForums Secondary Administrator
+ Download the CompuForums Thread Viewer!
+ Add yourself to the Member Map!
+ Be sure that you are up-to-date with the rules.
+ Still Not A Member? Register Now!
+ Contact Us
+ Email Me! - rob at compuforums dot org
+ipHideAway - Unfilter Anything Anywhere! Anonamize your surfing today!!
Reply With Quote