View Single Post
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 03-28-2007, 07:05 AM
guyladouche guyladouche is offline
Terabyte
 
Join Date: 15 Dec 2006
Location: Sacramento, CA, United States
Posts: 573
guyladouche is a jewel in the roughguyladouche is a jewel in the roughguyladouche is a jewel in the rough
Default

I used to use speedfan for temperature monitoring, but I'd recommend coretemp over speedfan if the interest is in accurate temperature reporting--it reports the temperatures more accurtely because speefan reports the temperature of the socket, whereas coretemp reports the actual temperature of the CPU core(s)--which is why in most cases coretemp reports higher temps than speedfan because the temp at the socket is cooler than the temp of the core itself. Also, speedfan isn't very good for multi-core temperature reporting as it only reports the temp of one of the cores--coretemp reports the temperature of each core.

However, coretemp lacks the other features of speedfan such as optional fan control if the motherboard supports it. The logging features of speedfan are also quite useful.
__________________
AMD Athlon 64 X2 4400+ (@2.6 GHz)
2x1GB OCZ Spec. Ops. PC3200
ASRock Dual939-SATA2
Antec TruePower 550 watt PSU
80 GB Seagate Barracuda SATA 7200 rpm
300 GB Seagate Barracuda SATA 7200 rpm
120 GB Maxtor ATA/133 7200 rpm
ATI Radeon x1950 Pro
Reply With Quote